Not all cycleways allow foot access, so tagging them as cycleway with foot=yes with the same issue, just with the modes of transportation reversed - how do you tell a cycleway which allows foot traffic from one that doesn't?
IMO, having a foot+cycle rendering separate from foot-only or cycle-only is a good idea. On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 15:09, Richard Mann <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not tag it as a cycleway? Then it will display as a cycleway. How is it > different from anything else that might be tagged as a cycleway? > > Richard > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Marc Schütz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Right now, ways highway=footway or highway=path,foot=designated where >> riding a bicycle is allowed with bicycle={yes,designated} are rendered as >> normal footways, so there is no way to see that they are open for bikes. >> >> Is there a chance this could be shown on Mapnik, or at least on the >> cyclemap? Maybe a mixed blue-red line, or even dashes for the "designated" >> vehicle type, and dots for the one with "yes"? >> >> Regards, Marc >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > -- David J. Lynch [email protected] _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
