From: Russ Nelson <r...@cloudmade.com>

> It's pretty dead.  Combination of questionable copyright over the base  
> data plus a lack of resources to really do it right.
> 
> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:tWX7VzUbGOsJ:openaerialmap.org/pipermail/talk_openaerialmap.org/2008-December/000055.html+http://openaerialmap.org/pipermail/talk_openaerialmap.org
> /2008-December/000055.html+site:openaerialmap.org&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=safari

Whoa there!

Chris's message is a good summary of the state of things in December. Certainly 
that iteration of OAM is dead. The need remains, and there's a lot of interest 
in rearchitecting.

Ideas range from peer to peer tile caching networks, cloud computing imagery 
processing, to simple indexes of distributed tile sources integrated in 
OpenLayers. 
In my view, we need to spec out phases, each one easily doable without huge 
resource commitments.

We started a page on the OpenAerialMap wiki to capture ideas, and write out a 
spec. Please contribute!

http://wiki.openaerialmap.org/OAM_2009

-Mikel
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to