SteveC wrote: > Wrong again. The ™ was applied for the logo and the name
So 'mark' means to me 'name' so OpenStreetMap was protected if it was granted, yes? > in the UK and > Europe and the Foundation owns the whole problem, not me. I thought you did 'something' in the foundation too ;) > Passive aggressiveness works much better when you're also correct :-) In your country it seems that companies can apply, and not persons on their private home addresses ;) KT13 9DP != CR5 3QZ But I am far too happy to be aggressive tonight :D The Dutch tax service was so nice :) Stefan _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
