On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Tom Chance <t...@acrewoods.net> wrote:
> Of course, determining whether your average bit of woodland in the UK is > landuse or natural is fun, given that pretty much all of it has been > carefully managed at soem stage over the past few hundred years! Why do we > care if it's mananged, and if it's a forest or wood? Knowing that would > help guide which tags to use, otherwise I'm tempted to just mark everything > as natural=wood and be done with it! > In my mind, something like this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/cricketbatwillow/825730972/ is "managed forest" and landuse=forest But something like this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sequella/425687849/in/photostream/ is mostly unmanaged and natural=wood. At least, that has been my interpretation of the wiki. - Gustav
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
