2009/7/20 Gustav Foseid <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Tom Chance <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Of course, determining whether your average bit of woodland in the UK is >> landuse or natural is fun, given that pretty much all of it has been >> carefully managed at soem stage over the past few hundred years! Why do we >> care if it's mananged, and if it's a forest or wood? Knowing that would >> help guide which tags to use, otherwise I'm tempted to just mark >> everything >> as natural=wood and be done with it! > > In my mind, something like this: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/cricketbatwillow/825730972/ > is "managed forest" and landuse=forest > > But something like this: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/sequella/425687849/in/photostream/ > is mostly unmanaged and natural=wood.
That has been exactly my interpretation, too, it didn't really occur to me the size of the wooded area would play a role in the tagging although that is how most people in this thread interpreted it. Cheers _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
