--- On Fri, 31/7/09, Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > Two boundary relations is also the way to map the > Australian example. I actually merged boundaries because there was 2 slightly wrong ones and I made one correct one from them both. Using a relation for the state boundary information seems like a better idea then splitting both into 2 different but identically placed boundaries. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
- [OSM-talk] Finding what country something is in (new websi... OJ W
- Re: [OSM-talk] Finding what country something is in (... Claudius
- Re: [OSM-talk] Finding what country something is ... Matthias Versen
- Re: [OSM-talk] Finding what country something is in (... John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] Finding what country something is ... OJ W
- Re: [OSM-talk] Finding what country something... John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] Finding what country somet... OJ W
- Re: [OSM-talk] Finding what country ... Maarten Deen
- Re: [OSM-talk] Finding what coun... John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] Something Mig... Marc Schütz
- Re: [OSM-talk] Something Mig... Jon Burgess
- Re: [OSM-talk] Something Mig... Marc Schütz
- Re: [OSM-talk] Something Mig... Andrew Ayre
- Re: [OSM-talk] Something Mig... Jon Burgess
- Re: [OSM-talk] Something Mig... Andrew Ayre
- Re: [OSM-talk] Something Mig... Jon Burgess
- Re: [OSM-talk] Something Mig... Andrew Ayre
- Re: [OSM-talk] Something Mig... Andrew Ayre
- Re: [OSM-talk] Something Mig... Tom Hughes