Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> writes: > 2009/7/31 Greg Troxel <[email protected]>: >> So probably the renderers need a way to show unclassified as less >> important than tertiary. > > they (t...@h, mapnik, cyclemap) are already doing this.
Sorry, I meant 'lower than tertiary and more important than residential'. I don't see unclassified showing up more than residential, and I don't see it in the map key on the main osm site. >> And perhaps 'residential' should be redefined as "only used by people >> who are traveling to a location on that road or a less important road >> that branches off it", removing the 'residential' notion. > > no, redefinition of widely used main tags (used according to the > existent definition, not updating the definition to common usage) > doesn't seem a good idea to me. I suggest to update your local tagging > guidelines (can't check them now due to problems of the wiki-server, > or your link was misspelled). In that case we need a parallel tag to unclassified, meaning local-only but without the residential notion. But around me there aren't enough such roads to worry about, and they're all tagged residential from massgis import anyway :-)
pgpqpaHMxnPxy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
