> > no, it's not, it's about relative order in the db. > > Fair enough. In other words, at any node which is a junction of way > segments with different layers (whether the segments are part of the > same way or different ways), the physical implication is that the > slope of the way changes in the close vicinity of that node.
Not even that: it only says something about the relative ordering, not about slope. Regards, Marc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
