2009/8/11 Jonathan Bennett <[email protected]>: > Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> no, we shouldn't. But what's so strange about the desire to tag >> nuclear installations? Why not tag all chemical plants? There is a lot >> of benefit in mapping not just "industrial" but also the type of >> industry, be it chemical, automotive, steel, clothing or whatever. > > There's a difference between mapping what you can verify -- the > presences of buildings, fences, structures, etc. and mapping pollution > or radioactivity levels, especially when you're not allowed anywhere > near the plant itself.
OK, than I got you wrong, of course we don't have either measures nor an adequat database-model to store concentrations of either nuclear or chemical fallout, but we can map the plants themselfs as well as storage places of their waste. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
