On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:19 AM, John Smith <[email protected]>wrote:
> 2009/8/31 Anthony <[email protected]>: > > What solution is better? Your lane-based solution doesn't work if there > is > > only one lane with bi-directional traffic. The solution of adding a node > > and a direction would be second best, but I think it's clunky adding > > multiple extra nodes instead of one relation. > > You really haven't read or understood the details I've put forth. > > As far as I can tell my solution does work, you treat the lanes as > children of the way, so a bi-direction way with traffic while 1 way, > is 2 lanes, and being able to tag those independent of each other is > the key to all this. Please re-read my previous posts on this matter. Please re-read my previous posts on this matter, regarding the road I live on. It is bi-directional, but it does not have two lanes. Are you suggesting we pretend it does? > Are you sure that's always true? I'm certainly not going to adhere to > that > > restriction. If you have a single way, there is an assumption that you > can > > > The you will be fighting every other mapper out there, it's clear that > physical barriers are used, not painted ones so you will end up with > edit wars when people confused with how you've gone off on your own > and it doesn't match what everyone else is doing. We'll see. I just took a look at the section of the OSM map related to the example I gave earlier, and it's too much of a mess for me to fix right now (it has a major highway listed as one way in the wrong direction). But when I fix it, I'm going to use separate ways, because that's the only way to get the routing data to be correct. If someone is going to revert me, I hope they will invent a method to get the routing data correct first. > relations or some other method to tie the lanes together in areas where > lane > > changing is allowed (lane changing allowed between way X, Y, and Z from > node > > A to node B)? > > But that's a hack to work with the existing framework, ie tagging for > software which isn't supposed to be done. No, it's a redesign of the whole system. A system which wasn't made for per-lane routing information.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
