2009/8/31 John Smith <[email protected]>: > 2009/8/31 Anthony <[email protected]>: >> No, it's a redesign of the whole system. A system which wasn't made for >> per-lane routing information. > > It wasn't designed with relations either, but they now exist too. > > In any case I've only suggested a minor change to add children to ways > and how this could be represented as one table for the DB and > additional tags for ways. Not exactly redoing things from scratch. >
Sorry it'd take 3 tables, one for lanes, one for nodes on those lanes and one for lane tags. As for per-lane routing, funnily enough people actually listed this as a reason to do it, so you can have smarter routing. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
