On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Anthony<[email protected]> wrote: > > Whether this > grouping is done by a relation or a new table isn't something I'm going to > comment on beyond the fact that it obviously could be done by a relation.
Yup. > I have a great fear of the solution proposed by John, though, specifically > because it allows nodes (and even more specifically, nodes which represent > junctions with other ways) to be attached to individual lanes. What do you mean by "it allows nodes to be attached to individual lanes"? Do you mean you don't think a lane should be represented by a series of nodes? > John would seemingly have us connect the > exit ramp with the rest of the road at the point of the physical gore. That > is completely incorrect. It is at the point where one must choose to use or > not use the exit that the split should take place, and the two ways should > remain parallel for a while until finally reaching the physical gore point. Yeah. This seems common sense to me. A separation (even in paint) is a physical separation, anyway. It is indeed still mapping what's on the ground. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
