2009/8/31 Anthony <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 1:40 PM, John Smith <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> 2009/8/31 Anthony <[email protected]>: >> >> > I guess we will have to agree to disagree, but it'd be nice if you'd >> > answer >> > my questions about how to do all those things I asked about. >> >> I don't see a point in answering any more of your questions to be >> honest, you seem to be trolling. > > You say "any more" as though you've answered any of them. You don't seem to > have thought things through. Think them through and you'll see that I'm not > trolling.
Now I know you're being a troll, however if we used lanes instead of using ways you could easily tag that intersection you gave as an exception rather than the average case that I presented which is a lot more common. So in short the answer is to have lanes, not ways. This would also solve using a relation to indicate a turning restriction as you could easily show which lanes can go where, it would allow for advanced routing and you can place stop signs on all lanes effected by it. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
