On 10/09/2009 10:02, David Earl wrote: > On 10/09/2009 09:44, Roy Wallace wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:02 PM, David Earl <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On 10/09/2009 01:11, Roy Wallace wrote: >>>> But I would support any proposal that merges these and includes >>>> complementary tags to explicitly specify differences as necessary. >>> Does it really matter? Just treat them as synonyms. >> Having two different ways to tag a particular entity is not the best >> solution when building a database, IMHO. > > Indeed, but when we have an anarchic rather than specified tagging > system, this is the least of our problems!
Sorry, I should also have said ... there are two tags because someone cared enough about the difference to want to differentiate them. I'm surprised whoever that was hasn't spoken up. David _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
