On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:13 PM, John Smith <[email protected]>wrote:
> 2009/9/21 Anthony <[email protected]>: > > You clearly define "way" differently than I do, and differently than the > > current definition. The bridge most certainly has multiple ways in OSM > > today. > > However that doesn't reflect reality It does reflect reality. It just reflects a different part of reality than you want it to reflect. > Just because it's tagged with multiple ways doesn't mean it's the best > way to do it. > True. But it is the best way to do it. > I never claimed there are 2 bridges. There is one bridge, with multiple > > ways. "bridge" does not equal "way". > > But there isn't multiple ways in reality, there is a single "way" or > bridge with 4 lanes + any footway/cycleways. > But there are multiple ways in reality. A "way" is a path of travel, not a piece of asphalt.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
