2009/9/21 Anthony <[email protected]>: > Mapping ways should follow the legal paths of travel, not the existence or > non-existence of concrete. If concrete is the only form of legal barrier, > then fine, concrete can determine how we map. But if a painted median is
Where do you draw the line over painted median strips exactly, the Bruce highway for example allows you to cross in some places and doesn't in others, but this is more a case of where it's safe to over take or not, should these sections where it's not safe to over take mean we draw 2 distinct ways as a result? http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&ie=UTF8&t=h&ll=-26.134596,152.582068&spn=0,359.990988&z=18&layer=c&cbll=-26.134719,152.583365&panoid=Zqx7qYT6v-zeBfuZnmywdA&cbp=12,270.23,,0,5.75 Also how would you do this: http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&ie=UTF8&t=h&ll=-26.134789,152.590678&spn=0,359.986063&z=17&layer=c&cbll=-26.134677,152.590969&panoid=eVbTF6vxWoolDxDVBQpWNg&cbp=12,77.27,,0,5.07 It's legal to cross the road from one side, but not the other, etc etc etc... > But if there is a concrete barrier in place, you agree we might have two > ways going over one bridge. So all this stuff about mapping individual > lanes is off-topic. You didn't express this opinion earlier, you were trying to show multiple ways where there is no physical barrier. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
