2009/9/21 Anthony <[email protected]>: > If you're allowed to cross it, for instance to make a turn, it should be > represented as one way. If you aren't, it shouldn't. In Florida and I
As I point out below, you can't turn depending on the centre line not being solid. Should we create multiple ways for intermittent areas where you can't cross or not? >> http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&ie=UTF8&t=h&ll=-26.134596,152.582068&spn=0,359.990988&z=18&layer=c&cbll=-26.134719,152.583365&panoid=Zqx7qYT6v-zeBfuZnmywdA&cbp=12,270.23,,0,5.75 > > In this case there appear to be no intersections or places to turn, in which > case it doesn't really matter. Irrelevent since you keep bringing up u-turns you can't do that either. > I'm not talking about where passing is allowed, I'm talking about where > turning is allowed. In any case, once again there appear to be no > intersections or places to turn, in which case it doesn't really matter. the link above you can only cross the road depending on the lane you are in. > If you can direct me to a site which explains these lines and what they > mean, I can give you a further response. It's really simple, solid line = you can't cross to turn in any respect, colour of the paint is irrelevent they used to use yellow they switched to white the law is still the same. >> You didn't express this opinion earlier, you were trying to show >> multiple ways where there is no physical barrier. > > Okay, fine, so we are in agreement? All this stuff about mapping individual > lanes is off-topic? We need a method to represent a single bridge with > multiple ways? Any suggestions? How could we be in agreement you've completely ignored my last point. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
