Dave F. wrote: > Anthony wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org >> <mailto:o...@inbox.org>> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org >> <mailto:o...@inbox.org>> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Richard Mann >> <richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com >> <mailto:richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com>> wrote: >> >> If we were just gathering data for rendering a >> single-scale street map, we'd add tags to a single way, >> and probably not bother with lane info. >> >> >> Depends how micro you want to get. With the detail people >> seem to want, you'd probably be best off with a paint program >> :). >> >> >> I'd love to one day see an open source map that looks like this: >> >> http://www.mytbi.com/urs/content/design/linksstagei/images/aerials/v8-pr.jpg >> >> (minus the part that's a photograph). >> >> >> Osmarender does a pretty good job of those bridges: >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=27.95907&lon=-82.53907&zoom=17&layers=0B00FTF >> >> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=27.95907&lon=-82.53907&zoom=17&layers=0B00FTF> >> >> Notice how it combines the two ways heading south into one bridge >> even without any additional information besides the fact that the two >> ways are close together. > Not saying you mapped it but it appears to be missing a trunk_link to > the north-west. > Also, shouldn't the S.R.589 be a bridge directly below it label in > that image. > And the link to the North East, doesn't that pass over a river of some > sorts? > Any idea what that aeroway-bridge is for? > > Ah! just overlayed Yahoo. Is the interchange going or gone through a major redevelopment?
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
