Anthony wrote: > > Also, shouldn't the S.R.589 be a bridge directly below it label in > that image. > > > I'm not sure what you're referring to there. Can you give me a way ID > and a couple point IDs? Sure: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=27.95915&mlon=-82.53835&zoom=16&layers=0B00FTF The ways appear to clash on the same layer > > > And the link to the North East, doesn't that pass over a river of > some sorts? > > > Looking at the Yahoo Map which we are allowed to derive from, which > may be out of date, it seems to be some sort of man-made canal. I > don't remember it, I don't have any pictures of it, and I'm not 100% > sure it wasn't filled in, so I'm not going to add it unless I can > manage to confirm it somehow. It's difficult mapping without the > benefit of the Yahoo aerials, and these Yahoo aerials are all out of date. > > It's awesome having more up-to-date info than Yahoo and Google, > especially knowing you helped make it. Definitely
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
