On 28 Sep 2009, at 10:06 , Ruben Wisniewski wrote: > I think the user speaks for itself, you can look at the history if you > want to know where the data came from. But I think there should be a > tag > like on the tiger data which indicates if the data was reviewed > locally, > to prove it is valid. >
such a tag is entirely useless. tiger data is the best example. - everyone can delete, copy, change tags - any tag can be changed - some mappers will follow the advice others will not, found a tiger way yesterday which was transformed into a portion of the coastline and added the coastline tag but kept most tiger tags. at the end this creates just more confusion. no application can rely on a reviewed=no tag If you ask mappers to actively add a source=* or reviewed=* tag then there is at least a higher chance it is there for a reason. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
