On 30 Sep 2009, at 08:15, Chris Hill wrote: > Dave F. wrote: >> Dave Stubbs wrote: >> >>> I wouldn't read too much into it, especially as they said, >>> "we’ve almost certainly got at least some of it wrong but >>> hopefully we >>> got part of it right and can correct the rest as we go" >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >> You see, this is the problem. I don't think, in this instance, >> they've >> done anything wrong. This is an OSM cock-up. >> I think it's quite selfish to expect others to pick up the pieces of, >> what I see, as lazy implementation. >> >> Who, within OSM & in their right sense of mind, would object to being >> forced to use just Yes/No. I mean it's just an on/off switch! >> >> > Yeah, OK Dave, we've got the message, you don't free-format tags. > Unfortunately you're going to have to get used to it, because it is > the > basis of the OPENstreetmap and, in my opinion, one of the reasons it > is > as successful as it is.
+1 Yours &c. Steve _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
