On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Emilie Laffray <[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
> 2009/11/4 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>
>
>
>>
>> 2009/11/4 Frederik Ramm <[email protected]>
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>>
>>>> I also think that Frederik is right: it should be possible to assemble
>>>> different outer ways to one outer polygon and define it's meaning with tags
>>>> just on the relation
>>>>
>>>
>>> This *is* already possible - and also necessary for (at least!) any
>>> polygon with a geometry of more than 2000 points.
>>>
>>>
>> OK, everything is possible. Does this work in current renderers, namely
>> t...@h? Mapnik has still problems with even most simple m-polygons (one
>> outer  and one inner closed way, tagged differently, no further tags on
>> multipolygon-relation).
>>
>
> Well in the case of multiple outers (all joined), multiple inners with tags
> on relation, Mapnik seems to be handling it fine.
>
>
So in otherwords, the 'outer' is not supposed to be tagged eithor? .. and
just tags on the relation?

Thanks,
Sam


> Emilie Laffray
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to