This actually sounds relatively easy to do... I will look into it before releasing the new version that puts tags back on relations.
Anyone else have relatively simple feature requests for shp-to-osm. I will have a little bit of time today. On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Serge Wroclawski <[email protected]> wrote: > Here's a tricky request (or request for a suggestion on how to solve): > > In DC we've been running these import sprints. shp-to-osm is now > centerpiece in presenting users with baked OSM files which they just > have to check manually against the data and import. > > Taking a simple example, I might have a file with a few hundred points. > > Ideally what I'd like to do is give a user a managable chunk of work. > > So, you may think "Just set the max nodes per file to something small, say > 10". > > The caviot is twofold: > > 1) That usually works but I can't guarantee that the nodes will be > close to one another. It'd be better to have bounding boxes, rather > than counts. > > 2) Nodes counts don't work when we're working with ways or relations. > > > Thoughts? Maybe some magic I can feed to QGIS to pre-process the data? > > - Serge >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
