Unless you include a definition of how close the trees have to be to the roadway, almost every roadway in areas with enough rainfall to support trees would be classified as tree-lined.
-- John F. Eldredge -- [email protected] "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria -----Original Message----- From: Konrad Skeri <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 22:14:56 Cc: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] alley - for tree-lined roads? +1 Adding a new value to the highway tag does not seem to fit with the current view of highway-tag usage. This suggestion keeps the "importance" of the roads intact (and thus helps routing software calculate the best route - should a tree-lined road be preferred over a tertiary? Over a unclassified?) And both a residential and tertiary can have trees on the sides. Konrad 2009/11/4 malenki <[email protected]>: > > As I explained at talk-de a new tag for $way_with_trees_beside is > suberfluous. Why not to use the existing natural= tag at existing ways > (railways, waterways, highways) like this: > highway=tertiary > surface=asphalt > natural:trees=left(/right/both) > name:botanical=Tilia tomentosa > > Regards > malenki > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
