Sorry, but I don't see a lot of OSM people going over to 'the dark side'. No matter how good or bad OSM is being run.
If I don't agree with how things are being done here at OSM then I'll try to fix it, work around it or quit, but I'm *not* going to be an unpaid employee for Google's mega profits. John Smith wrote: > 2009/12/6 Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com>: >> Iván Sánchez Ortega schrieb: >>> So you think that the OSMF is forcing people to do things, and controlling >>> instead of supporting? >> Does: "Say yes to the new license or we'll delete your data" sound more >> like supporting or controlling to you? > > I had the unfortunate experience to be involved with a project that > did something similar, it set the project's momentum back a lot and > with Google breathing down OSM's neck this would be the perfect > oportunity to give them all the human resources they could ever wish > for, at which point people will question if there is any point to OSM > any more since so much data might vanish and well I can't see that > being a good outcome. > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
