On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Mike Collinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> We really, really, really, like to keep your and everyone's edits going > forward. But we have to respect your choice. Under the current regime, you > are allowing your contributions to be used only under CC BY SA 2.0. We > could duck the issue now, but does even the most diehard CC BY SA 2.0 > supporter expect us to want the same license in 5 years, in 50 years? > What about dual licensing under CC-BY-SA and ODbL? That way you can keep the CC-BY-SA contributions. Of course, it doesn't make much sense, because the whole point of ODbL is that it's more restrictive than CC-BY-SA. But it shows that the problem at least some of us have is not any change, it's this particular change.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
