On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Stefan de Konink wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > SteveC schreef: >> On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Stefan de Konink wrote: >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA512 >>> >>> SteveC schreef: >>>> You're really advocating switching license without asking anyone? >>> Isn't he merely stating that if you truly believe CC-BY-SA doesn't >>> protect the data, you don't have to ask anyone to do so? >> >> to do what, relicense? > > Exactly; if your statement is sound. CC-BY-SA doesn't protect us, thus > doesn't protect us against ourselves, thus OSMF could declare the data > today as ODbL, and wait to get sued by the editors that doesn't like > this change, if the CC-BY-SA holds the relicense has just been made a > copyright infringement and therefore wasn't required in the first place.
So you really are saying the LWG / OSMF should just ignore everyone and change the license? I think it's better to build a consensus and vote and so on personally, even with all the ups and downs. Yours &c. Steve _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
