2009/12/11 paul youlten <[email protected]>: > Dave, > > Clearly all those things, and much more, can and should be mapped. > They can all be seen on the street and they all have public access. I > agree: "If it's a physical entity then it can be mapped." ++ > > What is less clear is what happens if changing the licence means we > lose "invisible" administrative boundaries and data from areas where > public access is difficult, restricted or non-existent. > > For example would be nice to include the boundaries of a UK National > Park or a site of special scientific interest or (dare I say it) the > coastline of Australia - but I don't think it is a "disaster" that > threatens the future of the project if these things are removed > because of a change in the licence. > > PY >
>From having seen it in quite a few Open Source projects, it would be a death sentence. Peter _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
