On Sat, 12 Dec 2009, Shalabh wrote: > While I am not advocating a fork (I am anyway voting a yes to ODBL), I dont > think a single community is always the answer. Single communities tend to > get static for the lack of competition. All successful open source projects > have parallels, whether through forking or because of different organic > origins. So I dont think if OSM has a parallel because of forking, it would > be bad. Gives people more choices to choose from and thats what freedom is > all about.
Honestly I'm happy to have GoogleMap as the competitor. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
