2009/12/20 Steve Bennett <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 1:41 PM, John Smith <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> You're not the first to notice this either, came up a feww weeks/month >> ago. > > Yeah, I see that one post on the mailing list, but no followup. Where are > the keen cyclists of OSM clamouring for an *open* cyclemap?
I keep telling you the words "open" and "free" are too ambiguous :P It considered open because it uses open data, it could be open because it's open for anyone to supply information to extend it, it's open because anyone can use the tiles (currently), don't ya just love the word open? :) Most of them might not have the technical skills or the inclination since someone else has already made something "good enough" _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
