2010/1/17 John Smith <[email protected]>: > 2010/1/18 Anthony <[email protected]>: >> I didn't say it's invalid so much as it's redundant. >> >> All contributions are effectively PD anyway. > > That still isn't the point, people want to produce PD data that is > readily accessible to all, not PD data shrink wraped with another > license.
OSM has masses of CC-BY-SA data and contributors. How will the PD people deal with that? Start replacing the existing CC-BY-SA data and reverting any edits to PD data by CC-BY-SA contributors? It doesn't look like this idea has had very much though behind it. It's pretty easy to see that two groups of people trying to reach the same goal with different licenses within the same database is going to cause friction. -- DavidD _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
