On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Roy Wallace <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Ian Mc Shane <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> private banking services > > private_banking_services=yes > >> foreign exchange > > foreign_exchange=yes > >> tanning > > tanning=yes > >> massage? > > massage=yes
I think this approach (turning x=tag into tag=yes) is problematic, due to the sheer number of tags it makes possible. Pretty soon there will be a semantic clash between an existing key, and an existing value. I don't know, a power company will go from office=power to power=yes or something, clashing with the existing power=* tags. Are you sure it wouldn't be better to push for "amenity=cafe;bakery;atm" style multi-tagging instead? Steve _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
