On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Richard Fairhurst <[email protected]> wrote: > > That is 300 times more open to misinterpretation than the cycleway example. > Yet we cope.
So you're arguing that, because you guys are able to "cope", these kind of tags are necessarily a good idea? The only thing they avoid is a few keystrokes. Don't get me wrong - I really like your "duck test", and in general it works really well. But as I implied before, a cycleway still isn't defined as well as a duck. It may never be... (though I'm still looking forward to a verifiable definition...) _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
