SteveC wrote: > Well I'll go further. > > openstreetbugs is basically there but has a crappy UI. It needs to be > > 1) click 'feedback' or 'problem' > 2) enter problem > 3) click ok > > the extra step of clicking where the problem is should not happen, we should > get that from the bbox or center point plus zoom. So with some changes I > think we can integrate OSB and expose it front and center to help fix up the > bugs. >
How is zooming all the way in & repeatedly panning around to centre up, quicker than one click to _accurately_ locate the problem? > 2) We have to be very clear that the openstreetmap.org website is _awful_. > Horrendous. A total PITA. We're all here because we're persistent with it. > But the wonderful thing is - we don't have to make the tools and site easy to > use if we can expose a simple bug system. It's very clear that nobody can > convince Richard to actually write something any muggle would really want to > use, you can scream at him to finish the mythical Potlatch 2 all you want, > but he doesn't give a shit and lives on a boat in bliss. That's his choice, > and it's totally fine, but if we all feel that way then we have to deal with > the downside that every single day we lose tens of thousands of edits because > of that monopoly on bad UI. All I'm suggesting is we sidestep the problem and > connect people who can report a map bug but can't be bothered to deal with > pain and suffering of potlatch with the people who can deal with it, at least > until Richard gets his act together and stops fixing every stupid thing in > the old codebase. You have to take a step back here and realise what we're > missing out on. You really are a grade A tosser. When most people here treat others with respect, why do you have to degenerate it into a juvenile, Youtube style slanging match? What do you think Granny's reaction will be when she reads this? Dave F. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
