On Feb 21, 2010, at 1:08 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:

> On 21/02/10 07:38, SteveC wrote:
> 
>> On Feb 20, 2010, at 11:20 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> 
>>> SteveC wrote:
>>>> Wrong. Map bugs. Did you read my post Fred ? :-)
>>> 
>>> So you meant to integrate uservoice.com instead of integrating 
>>> openstreetbugs? But can their system tie notes to map locations?
>> 
>> Well I'll go further.
>> 
>> openstreetbugs is basically there but has a crappy UI. It needs to be
>> 
>> 1) click 'feedback' or 'problem'
>> 2) enter problem
>> 3) click ok
>> 
>> the extra step of clicking where the problem is should not happen, we should 
>> get that from the bbox or center point plus zoom. So with some changes I 
>> think we can integrate OSB and expose it front and center to help fix up the 
>> bugs.
> 
> I have been trying for several years now to get somebody to do a properly 
> integrated version of openstreetbugs and obviously things
> like defaulting based on the current map view would be a perfectly sensible 
> thing for such a tool to do.

Go to oDesk.com and pay someone to do it? That's what I did. I think the 
community is great at many things, but for those you spend years on not 
convincing anybody, you can just pay them.

> Like Fred I'm really not sure about using an external site like this in much 
> the same way that I've resisted integrating an external tool like 
> openstreetbugs into the main site. I will go and have a look at uservoice now 
> though, assuming that it's back up...

I don't care if it's uservoice or whatever. The thing about uservoice is though 
that it's working today and they have free plans for open source projects. If 
there's a better solution, lets use it.

Yours &c.

Steve


_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to