Roy Wallace wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Carsten Gerlach <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Yes, that's right, have a look at http://osm.org/go/0MBdEXMHO- for example. > > That looks great, and so simple... highway=* for the way, AND > highway=* + area=yes for the area.
I already used it a while ago, in a small fraction of my city, just to "experiment" a bit: http://osm.org/go/xZHrPUmuB-- > Is this a solved problem, then? Any complaints with this approach > (cause it looks damn pretty on mapnik, at least...) I remember someone complaining with me that routers not supporting highway=* + area=yes in the same relation with a "normal" highway=*, might get confused -- and that something like "landuse=road" would be better. I don't know which of the two to choose though. Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
