On Monday 22 February 2010 23:26:52, John Smith wrote: > On 23 February 2010 08:05, David Paleino <[email protected]> wrote: > > I remember someone complaining with me that routers not supporting > > highway=* + area=yes in the same relation with a "normal" highway=*, > > might get confused -- and that something like "landuse=road" would be > > better. > > Wouldn't landuse=road bleed colour between the way and the area?
If you noted the link I included in my mail, I haven't used it. I think landuse=road is semantically more correct than highway=* + area=yes (but this could be debatable too), but the drawback is that renderers have the burden of colouring landuse=road the same way of its way. If both are in a relation, it could probably be done, but I believe it'd take some effort. I personally think highway + area is more straightforward. My 2c, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
