On 25/03/10 00:11, Greg Troxel wrote: > The great irony is that the complaints about Apple not supplying Java > 1.6 should really be directed at JOSM's use of a non-Free language > implementation. The real bug is that JOSM is dependent on a non-Free > JDK, instead of relying on a widely portable implementation available > under an open source license. In other words (to be inflammatory) the > JOSM community is willfully chained to a non-Free language > implementation. > > (Yes, I know about openjdk, and I've tried to run josm and mkgmap under > it on NetBSD/i386. So far I'm not having a successful experience.)
I've been running JOSM under OpenJDK on linux for a considerable period now with no problems at all. Tom -- Tom Hughes ([email protected]) http://compton.nu/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
