Hi, Anthony wrote: > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:04 AM, John Smith <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 6 April 2010 18:00, Igor Brejc <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I don't know about NSW and Vic case, but in the above cases the > official > > Well we're talking about this specific case and the border is based on > the southern bank of the main flow of the river. > > > Do you have a legal document or court case or something stating that?
Without having any detail about Australia, I know for sure that there are boundaries which are legally defined in relation to a river or other natural feature, and will move if the feature moves. Other boundaries are defined as a geometric line which, at the time of definition, happened to coincide with a natural feature but will not move with it. And that's all not even considering plate tectonics. Bye Frederik _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
