On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Konrad Skeri <[email protected]> wrote: > > In your case you would get 3 relations. I-70 to exit 91 (with > destination= according to the sign at I-70), exit 91 to exit 91A, and > exit 91 to exit 91B (with destination= accoring to the sign(s) at exit > 91 before the 91A/B fork).
It may be just me, but using type=destination_sign + ref=91 seems to imply that "91" is a property of the sign. Doesn't an "exit" exist independently of the sign? If so, is there a way to map it independently of a destination_sign? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
