* Roy Wallace <[email protected]> [2010-04-24 10:55 +1000]: > It may be just me, but using type=destination_sign + ref=91 seems to > imply that "91" is a property of the sign.
That's a good point. Perhaps it would make more sense to have an exit_ref tag (and document it on the wiki?). > Doesn't an "exit" exist independently of the sign? If so, is there a > way to map it independently of a destination_sign? It does, but I don't see any better relation for it, and I don't feel comfortable enough with OpenStreetMap yet to want to start proposing new relations. What started me on this topic was one person on IRC saying that they'd used the destination_sign relation for exits before, so at least there's precedent. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- Never pet a burning dog. -- Bart Callan ---- --- -- _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
