On 1 May 2010 18:27, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > Please don't get to personal here, it is not about my morals. It is > about consistency and clarity.
There isn't much I can do about the truth offending you, you did indeed use emotive language to push an agenda based on your morals. > I just find it confusing. Really there is no clarity in this example, > as to the rights of the user. What is the exact license of the > software? What is the agreement that you enter into by downloading? I > would say that it is not clear. What does software license ambiguities have to do with the OSM wiki? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
