Hi, Anthony wrote: > I guess the suggestion to "map what's on the ground" is good advice as > long as it's not exclusionary. But my beef is with people who tell us > to "map what's on the ground" to the exclusion of everything that isn't > on the ground.
Problem is that whatever is not on the ground is not verifiable; I'd have to take the mapper's word for it. And this opens the door to people inventing stuff. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
