There probably needs to be two separate tags: one for little fenced off areas that aren't anything else, and another for large areas that are an overlay on other landuses. The existing tag is for small single-purpose areas: you need another tag for the other type, not to change the rendering of the original.
Richard On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Vladimir Vyskocil <[email protected]> wrote: > Here is another example : http://osm.org/go/YzUCAP8q-- > It is a nature_reserve in the sea ("Reserve Cousteau", Bouillante, > Guadeloupe), we can see that it hides the "Ilets Pigeons" islands... > I think it should not be filled or with a semi-transparent color. > > Vlad. > > On 28 juin 2010, at 20:32, yvecai wrote: > >> Today, the polygons tagged with leisure=nature_reserve are rendered on the >> slippy map in the leisure layer, thus overlapping and hiding other landuse >> (like 'wood' for instance: http://osm.org/go/0CAfHX7). >> These polygons should be rendered in the misc_boundaries layer, along with >> boundary=national_park and with a similar transparency. >> >> Or maybe a tag boundary=nature_reserve would be more appropriate ? >> >> Yves >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
