2010/7/4 Oliver (skobbler) <[email protected]>: > exclusive. I just say that the more projects there are, the longer it takes > to achieve a specific goal.
if one is a cyclist with interest in cycling, she/he will not go out mapping parking lots or petrol stations just because someones declares that they are important. The same is for adresses: it is not much fun to map them, and therefore few people do it ;-) > if people map trees unless attributes with a wider use have been captured in > this region. I am pretty sure that some of these people who map trees would > be happy giving a hint what is important for the OpenStreetMap community and > map other elements instead. And until nobody tells them what is important > for the OpenStreetMap community they map what they think is right. actually I don't understand why so many people complain about mapping trees. Trees have generally a longer life cycle than buildings. I like trees and I like to have them in the map. Why should I map postboxes? I hardly send any letters. Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
