On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 08:05:58PM +0200, SteveC wrote: wonder if you realise the fine line you are walking here by > > employing such hard line tactics, you are literally risking an out > > right rejection of ODBL because of this. How much time and effort will > > have been in vein exactly? > > I think you're overblowing the numbers here with 'risking a out right > rejection'. 200,000 people, or whatever, will be asked about the ODbL under > the plan,
That is just a part of the problem: The only question that is being asked is if we agree to the ODbL. We also need to take into account at least: * Do you agree to license your data under the DbCL? * Do you agree to the contributor terms? Simon -- A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works.—John Gall
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
