On 20 July 2010 18:59, Peteris Krisjanis <[email protected]> wrote: > Frederik, again you mix it all up. I said i'm fine with ODBL (and so > far everyone who rants about CT says nothing bad about ODBL). I truely > respect huge work putted into it. What I don't like is that CT section > 3 practically strips all this good work away, with having vague > definition of "new and open license". If this can be clarified with SA > and Attribution clauses, then everything is very very ok.
I'm starting to wonder if this is intentional misdirection to keep confusing the issue of a relicensing with whole sale update of contributor terms. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
