Am 20.07.2010 22:06, schrieb andrzej zaborowski: > On 20 July 2010 11:07, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: >> If any >> any future time OSM thinks that a non-share-alike license would be best - >> why should we, today, try to dictate our wish to them? > > Because each of us is an author of a little chunk of data and want to > have a say in how that chunk is released? (For example as a > share-alike fan I want my own personal mapping to influence those who > derive from it to release more data so we can all benefit)
Well you'll get a say with or without the SA-Clause in the CT, provided you stay interested enough to keep actively mapping to be eligible to vote on future changes to another "free and open" license. I fail to see your problem. There will always be the safeguard of active member vote plus the limit of "free and open", which, both combined provide a nice safeguard against "evil stuff". -- Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie Bremen - 53.0901°N 8.7868°E Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
