As pointed out, you only have 255 characters. No one is suggesting a book needs to be written. There is a difference between "useful" and "exhaustive." All we are asking for is "useful" comments. "Cleaning up validator problems in Ottowa using a CANVEC source" or pull the reference to CANVEC out into a source=* changeset tag. Seriously. It is that simple people!
I just ran into some problem roads last night along Kansas highway 18 where it would have been a big help to have some useful comments in the history. If you are in an area with more than a few active mappers I can *guarantee* you that at least one other person is looking at your changeset comments. I live in the middle of nowhere Kansas and I know at least one other person is watching the area. Toby On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:30 AM, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Currently I'm cleaning up in Ottawa, I have over 8,000 errors to clean > up left and recently I've probably cleaned at least a couple of > thousand errors so far. Things like incorrect street names, where I > have a CANVEC source that helps enormously, connecting streets up so > you can run routing software. etc. > > Are you seriously suggesting for each correction I do a write up > saying why I or Validator think its wrong and my source for the > correction? > > Thanks > > Cheerio John > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
