On 11 August 2010 03:26, Patrick Kilian <[email protected]> wrote: > There is a big difference between pointing out "the current form of the > contributor terms means that we will loose 80% of the data in Australia. > Do you really want to proceed?" and jumping into every thread and > spreading FUD that has been dissected and disproved several times by > different people. Only one is poisonous to the project. Can you spot which?
At least if you are going to start your own FUD get the details correct, the estimate is 1/3-1/2 no one said anything about 80%... Secondly no one has disproved anything, unless you count speculation as proof. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
